Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 2004No. B158894, B160783PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

These appeals began in an underinsured motorist (UIM) arbitration between appellant Safeco Insurance Company of America (Safeco) and respondent Morton Weinberg. Morton received an award well above the limits of his automobile policy with Safeco. After Safeco paid the policy limits, Morton and his wife, respondent Roberta B. Weinberg, sued Safeco for bad faith. Respondents lost, and judgment was entered for Safeco. When Safeco sought to recover its expert fees, the superior court found Safeco’s joint Code of Civil Procedure section 1 998 offer (998 offer) to compromise was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flexdar, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Peterson v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. MENEES v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Maaso v. SignerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Shultz v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API