United States v. Weatherford
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*425Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
The question presented by the certificate of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy is whether defense counsel can ever properly argue at trial that a punitive discharge is an appropriate punishment for an accused.
Defense counsel cannot ask the court-martial to impose a punitive discharge
when the express 0r implied desire of the accused is to the contrary. United States v Garcia, 18 USCMA 5, 39 CMR 5 (1968); United States v Mitchell, 16 USCMA 302, 36 CMR 458 (1966). In this case, the United States Navy Court of Military Review noted that defense…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. ProwUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. BlunkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. LarneardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. DresenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. SorianoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. PinedaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.