Legal Opinion
United States v. Pineda
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided January 9, 2001No. 99-0915/MCPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*299Judge SULLIVAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
On August 28, 1997, appellant was tried by a special court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone at the Naval Legal Service Office, Middle Atlantic, Norfolk, Virginia. In accordance with his pleas, he was found guilty of unauthorized absence, nine specifications of making false official statements, forgery, and six specifications of fraud against the United States, in violation of Articles 86, 107, 123, and 132, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 907, 923, and 932. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RayaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. WeatherfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. VolmarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. DresenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. CaptainCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. BolkanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.