United States v. Prow
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
Concluding that the sentence to a bad-conduct discharge imposed upon the accused by a special court-martial was “clearly excessive,” a board of review changed it to confinement at hard labor for three months and forfeiture of $30.00 per month for a like period. At the same time, the board of review held that the confinement portion of the sentence was effective as of the date the original sentence was imposed by the court-martial; the forfeitures were ordered to take effect as of the date of the convening authority’s action. Proceeding under Article 67…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. KelleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. BriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. WeatherfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.