Legal Opinion
Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 31, 2007No. AC 25837PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This zoning appeal returns to this court on remand from our Supreme Court; Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 281 Conn. 553, 916 A.2d 5 (2007); for resolution of the claim of the plaintiff, Wanda Vine, that the trial court improperly determined that the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of North Branford (board) had the authority to grant a variance after it previously had denied the first application for a variance by the defendant M & E Construction, Inc. (M & E). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In the plaintiffs first appeal to this court, she claimed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Harris v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Rural Water Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Stuart v. FreibergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Loring v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.