Stuart v. Freiberg
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiffs, William A. Stuart and Jonathan Stuart, appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Richard M. Freiberg, and from the court’s subsequent denial of their motion to reargue. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment1 on the plaintiffs’ claims sounding in fraud, negligent misrepresentation, accounting malpractice and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.2 We reverse the summary judgment as to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- New Milford Savings Bank v. RoinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fountain Pointe, LLC v. CalpitanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Dingle v. DellingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Freiberg v. StuartDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Freiberg v. StuartCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Mukon v. GollnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.