Legal Opinion
Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 6, 2007No. 17619, 17620PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
These certified appeals arise from the decision of the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals of the town of North Branford (board), granting the variance application of the defendant M & E Construction, Inc. (M & E). The plaintiff, Wanda Vine, appealed from the board’s decision to the trial court and the trial court dismissed the appeal. The plaintiff then appealed to the Appellate Court, which reversed the judgment of the trial court in a divided opinion. See Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 93 Conn. App. 1, 887 A.2d 442 (2006). We granted the defendants’ separate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- White v. KampnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. Fernando V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Morgan v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.