Legal Opinion

Capital Carpet Cleaning & Dye Co. v. Employment Security Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1985No. Docket 80709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

The issue in the instant case is whether or not certain carpet cleaners are employees of plaintiff, a carpet cleaning company operated out of the City of Ferndale, Oakland County, Michigan. It is plaintiff’s position that the carpet cleaners are independent contractors. It is the defendant’s position that the carpet cleaners are employees and that plaintiff must, therefore, pay employment security taxes based on "remunerations” made to these "employees”.

On January 30, 1980, the Michigan Employment Security Commission issued a redetermination finding that certain carpet cleaners…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Askew v. MacOmberMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. McKissic v. BodineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Goodchild v. EricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Industro-Motive Corp. v. WilkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morin v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Seligman & Associates, Inc. v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API