Legal Opinion

Askew v. MacOmber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1976No. 57433, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The defendant-appellant, the estate of M. Alicia Macomber, 1 appeals from a Court of Appeals decision 2 finding defendant-appellant to be the sole employer of the plaintiff and therefore exclusively liable for workmen’s compensation payments. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

I

The plaintiff was injured in April of 1969 as a result of a slip and fall on the porch steps at Mrs. Macomber’s home. Defendants do not dispute plaintiffs injury. The question on appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in finding that Mrs. Macomber was the sole employer of the plaintiff. 3

In November of 1965,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Renfroe v. Higgins Rack Coating & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. McKissic v. BodineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Nichol v. BillotMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Farrell v. Dearborn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Clark v. United Technologies Automotive, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API