Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This case involves the plight of a woman who vigorously attempted to establish her eligibility for and right to unemployment benefits. We find that claimant, Linda Wiersma, is entitled to the benefits. Therefore, we affirm the circuit court’s decision which affirmed the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review’s decision in favor of the claimant.
Respondent Michigan Bell Telephone Company was claimant’s employer. Michigan Bell appeals as of right from the circuit court’s decision. Michigan Bell contends that the claimant has no right to benefits because she was not entitled to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. Pennsylvania Erection & ConstructionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Oliphant v. FrazhoMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Kempf v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- West Bay Exploration Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Capital Carpet Cleaning & Dye Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- Antiphon, Inc v. Lep Transport, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Berry v. City of BellevilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989