Legal Opinion

Wiersma v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1986No. Docket 85729PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the plight of a woman who vigorously attempted to establish her eligibility for and right to unemployment benefits. We find that claimant, Linda Wiersma, is entitled to the benefits. Therefore, we affirm the circuit court’s decision which affirmed the Michigan Employment Security Board of Review’s decision in favor of the claimant.

Respondent Michigan Bell Telephone Company was claimant’s employer. Michigan Bell appeals as of right from the circuit court’s decision. Michigan Bell contends that the claimant has no right to benefits because she was not entitled to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. Pennsylvania Erection & ConstructionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Oliphant v. FrazhoMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kempf v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. West Bay Exploration Co. v. Amoco Production Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Capital Carpet Cleaning & Dye Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Antiphon, Inc v. Lep Transport, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Berry v. City of BellevilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API