Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Vasta
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 6, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 5, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant made willfully false statements to obtain benefits.
Following a hearing, an Administrative Law Judge found that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed and charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits. However, the Administrative Law Judge overruled the determination of the local unemployment office finding that claimant made a willful false statement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of MarinelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of Le PoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of DesirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of LoReAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of RowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of MaldarelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003