Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Forbes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 26, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeiss, P. J.
Appeal from that part of a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 1991, which imposed a forfeiture of effective days as a penalty in reduction of future benefits.
Claimant was called back to work as a laborer in the construction industry on June 3, 1988. When he filed his certifications for benefits later that month, he indicated that he had returned to work on June 10, 1988. Claimant did not dispute the findings of his work days, contending that his error was inadvertently caused by a mistaken recollection that he returned to work on June 10 rather than June 3.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of PettyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Claim of VickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- In re the Claim of BunzlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of SilversteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of MarinelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of EcklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of VastaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Reed v. OakleyNew York Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.