Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Le Pore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 1998PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 31, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.

Claimant was receiving unemployment insurance benefits at a time when she was starting up a pet-sitting business. She engaged in various activities toward this end including filing a certificate of doing business, ordering printed stationery and business cards, purchasing supplies and placing newspaper advertisements soliciting customers. The Unemployment Insurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SilversteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of MarinelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re the Claim of WahlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BlankenshipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of MagliaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of VastaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. In re the Claim of KerrsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API