Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rowland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 2, 2005, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant filed an application for unemployment insurance benefits effective May 12, 2003. Thereafter, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits for the period August 25, 2003 through February 22, 2004 because he was not totally unemployed and that he made willful false statements to obtain *744benefi…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of VastaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of KunzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of KoppelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of DeOliveiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API