Legal Opinion
Richey v. Pedersen
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1950No. Civ. 14445PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
In an action for attorney’s services and for a declaration of rights in real property, the court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appealed. The principal question raised is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.
Undisputed Facts
In 1938, defendant Charles J. Pedersen * obtained a judgment against one Martha K. Roberts. The attorney who obtained the judgment had been unsuccessful in realizing on it. In the latter part of 1940, Joseph B. Bates, an attorney at law (plaintiff’s assignor) undertook to investigate the possibility of collecting the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Frost v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Biaggi v. SawyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Owens v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Pearson v. HendrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ness v. Greater Arizona Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Weingetz v. ChevertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Leighton v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Modern Mills, Inc. v. HavensIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.