Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Hendrick

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1910No. Civ. No. 821PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

The action was to recover the value of certain work and labor performed and expenses incurred as a civil engineer on behalf of defendants at their special instance and request, the reasonable value of which was alleged to have been $5,518.55, and a balance unpaid of $2,205.95. The answer denied the performance of the services or their value, and alleged that such services as were performed were under a special contract through which the sum should not exceed $2,500.

Trial was had by the court, findings and judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which judgment, and an order denying a new trial,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lackmann v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richey v. PedersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Evans v. BuchananDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979
  3. Riley v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API