Legal Opinion

Modern Mills, Inc. v. Havens

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1987No. 16419PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Modem Mills, Inc., sought payment on W.W. Havens’ promissory note and on his merchandise account with the mill.1 Havens counterclaimed to obtain an accounting and profits from certain joint ventures with Modem Mills. Following trial without a jury, the court entered a judgment in favor of Modern Mills for $22,901.76 plus costs and attorney fees. The court denied Havens any relief on his counterclaim.

On appeal, Havens raises a variety of issues. We have organized these issues according to the particular account in question. First, does the record support the trial court’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Resource Engineering, Inc. v. SilerIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rangen, Inc. v. Valley Trout Farms, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dursteler v. DurstelerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Shaw v. LobeWashington Supreme Court · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barry Stimpson v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Needs v. HebenerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Jaime Charboneau v. Tyrell DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. NiedererIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Drakos v. SandowIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API