Legal Opinion

Lewitt v. Park Ecclesiastical Society

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 19, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

The motion to correct the finding was properly denied by the trial judge for the reason given by him. Quite likely the first part of the paragraph quoted in the statement might have been found had it been asked for without the last five words. The trial judge had a right to treat the requested paragraph as a whole. The judge was asked to find as a fact that plaintiffs had observed the gangway, not that they had opportunities of observation. The court has found that the gangway was a well cindered driveway, and the evidence of Fisher showed that George LeWitt had been on the driveway. That he…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Downer v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  2. Allis v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Fisk's Appeal From Doings of CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Park Bros. v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  5. Avery v. SpicerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. RichmondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Kulmacz v. MilasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Schoolnick v. FinmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API