Schoolnick v. Finman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The submission to the arbitrators by these partners was a general common-law submission of all of their disputes and disagreements. The submission did not provide, as it might have, the method of the award, whether it should be in writing or oral. The arbitrators might have made the award in writing or orally. Jones v. Dewey, 17 N. H. 596, 598; Gay v. Waltman, 89 Pa. St. 453, 456; Philbrick v. Preble, 18 Me. 255; Phelps v. Dolan, 75 Ill. 90.
A submission to arbitration is an agreement by the parties that the decision of the arbitrators shall be final as to all matters properly within the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carter v. CarterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Mathews v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Ott v. . SchroeppelNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Lewitt v. Park Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Rhodes v. HardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- International Union v. Fafnir Bearing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 677 v. Trudon & Platt Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LightyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.