Legal Opinion
Veits v. City of Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 10, 1948PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
A substitute complaint was filed in this case which contained six counts. One of the defendants, Malley, demurred to it for misjoinder of causes of action, the trial court sustained the demurrer, the plaintiff failed to plead over, and judgment was entered for the defendant Malley. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed.
The complaint is very badly framed by reason of its failure to disclose with any reasonable clarity the facts upon which the plaintiff relies for a recovery, its inexcusable redundancy and its obvious inclusion of extraneous matter. The first three counts allege that…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Davenport v. . RuckmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Craft Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. Quinnipiac Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Bacon v. Town of Rocky HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Dettenborn v. Hartford-National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Giglio v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.