Park Bros. v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for breach of written contract to purchase a certain quantity of steel; brought to the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County and tried to the court, Taintor, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiff for alleged errors of the court in the admission of testimony.
1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.
This is an action brought to recover damages for the breach of a written contract, dated December 14th, 1888. The contract is set out in full in the amended complaint. It is in the form of a written proposal addressed by the plaintiff to the defendant, and is accepted by the defendant in writing upon the face of the contract. Such parts of the contract as appear to be material are here given: —“ We propose to supply you with fifteen net tons of tool steel, of good and suitable quality, to be furnished prior to January 1st, 1890, at ” prices set forth in the contract for the qualities of steel…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Goode v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Northrop's executors v. GravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Connecticut National Bank v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Allis v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.