Legal Opinion

Reid v. Spazio

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 9, 2009No. 199, 2008PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Dennis Reid appeals from the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of his complaint against Defendant-Appellees on grounds that it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and by laches. Reid makes two arguments on appeal. First, he contends that his claim is preserved by the Delaware Savings Statute.1 Second, he contends that his claim is not barred by laches. We find that Reid’s claim is preserved by the Delaware Savings Statute and that the Court of Chancery erred in dismissing the complaint. Accordingly, we reverse.

I. Facts and Procedural History

This…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, Mike FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Dunlap v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. KempSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips ElectronicsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  3. Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  4. Vichi v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2012
  5. Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API