Legal Opinion

Malpiede v. Townson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 27, 2001No. 80, 2000PublishedCited by 568 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we affirm the holding of the Court of Chancery that allegations in the class action complaint challenging a merger do not support the plaintiff stockholders’ claims alleging: (1) breaches of the target board’s duty of loyalty or its disclosure duties; and (2) aiding and abetting or tortious interference by the acquiring corporation. We further affirm the granting of a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ due care claim on the ground that the exculpatory provision in the charter of the target corporation authorized by 8 Del. C. § 102(b)(7), bars any claim for…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  5. Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by568 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. VLIW TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  3. In Re General Motors (Hughes) Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
  5. Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006

563 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API