Legal Opinion

Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 15, 2013No. C.A. No. 7301-VCLPublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LASTER, Vice Chancellor.

Bloodhound Technologies, Inc. (“Bloodhound” or the “Company”) created web-*628based software applications that allowed healthcare providers to monitor claims for fraud. The plaintiffs are five software developers, including Bloodhound’s founder, who contend that their years of hard work laid the foundation for the Company’s success. All held common stock. They claim that after Bloodhound raised its initial rounds of venture capital financing, the venture capitalists obtained control of the Company’s board of directors. From that point on, they say, the venture…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Central Mortgage Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  5. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. Prairie Capital III, L.P. v. Double E Holding Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  3. In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  4. Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. VertinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  5. El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API