Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.'
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
Under provisions of sections 87 and 38 of the act approved March 6, 1891, known as the City Charter, sections 3808, 3809, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (Acts 1891, p. 137), thé city of Indianapolis proceeded to annex certain territory, a part of which consisted of unplatted lands owned by the appellant railroad companies.
Appellants appealed from such annexation to the court below, claiming the right to take such appeal by reason of the provision in section 38 of said act, that “an appeal may be taken from such annexation, by one or more resident freeholders, in the territory sought to be annexed, filing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Taggart v. ClaypoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Aspinwall v. Ohio & Mississippi R. R.Indiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Kirkland v. Board of Public WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HardenIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burritt v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- Kunesh v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of AlexandriaIndiana Supreme Court · 1899