Kunesh v. City of Great Falls
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE CASTLES:
This is a taxpayers’ suit opposing annexation of a city subdivision. In the lower court annexation was sustained. The protestants who filed this action through plaintiff and through him are here the appellant and will be referred to as plaintiff. The City of Great Falls and its officials, defendants below and respondents on appeal, will be called collectively the City. The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the City. The area is called the Fifteenth Addition.
We shall refer to the date through which timely protest could be received, set forth in the notice of resolution…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Damp v. Town of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Gilna v. BarkerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Takahashi's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1942
- Sharkey v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Carwile v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burritt v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- Lima School District No. 12 v. SimonsenMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- McCarthy v. Montana Power CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- O'Donnell Fire Service & Equipment Co. v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Konen v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.