Legal Opinion

Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. Kistler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1896No. 17,340PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This is a proceeding by information in the nature of quo warranto, filed by the prosecuting *232attorney of the Cass Circuit Court against appellants, seeking to forfeit the corporate existence of the Eel River Railroad Company for the alleged reason that it has leased its railroad and abandoned its corporate property and franchises to the Wabash Railroad Company, its co-appellant. Appellants are corporations organized under the laws of this State. The venue of said cause was changed to the court below, where final judgment was rendered against appellants.

It is earnestly insisted by appellants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bass Foundry v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Robertson v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Beard v. BeardIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Kinnaman v. KinnamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Chapell v. ShueeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Vesolowski Ex Rel. Vesolowski v. RepayIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Daniels v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SeerleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API