Legal Opinion
Pantzalas v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1969No. Civ. 33998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, J. pro tem. *
The petitioners seek a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to vacate its order denying petitioners’ motion to compel further answers to the written interrogatories numbered 1 and 2 and to issue a new order granting their request in the matter entitled Ruth Winsler Pantzalas, etc. v. Pacific Indemnity, Superior Court number WEC 14538.
Facts
Prior to Ms death, John M. Pantzalas was an employee of the Regents of the University of California. The Pacific Indemnity Company, the real party in interest, acting as the insurer entered into…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- West Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Walker v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bunnell v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- McCormick v. Sentinel Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- John E. Ward v. Management Analysis Company Employee Disability Benefit Plan, and Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hinckley v. Bechtel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.