Legal Opinion
Hinckley v. Bechtel Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1974No. Civ. 31265PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Plaintiff Mabel W. Hinckley, individually and as administratrix of the estate of Charles Hinckley (“appellant”), appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after respondents’ demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The allegations of appellant’s first amended complaint, which in ruling on a demurrer must be regarded true (Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 493, 496 [86 Cal.Rptr. 88, 468 P.2d 216]; Flores v. Arroyo (1961) 56 Cal.2d 492 [15 Cal.Rptr. 87, 364 P.2d 263]), disclose that Charles Hinckley (“Hinckley”) was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Photovest Corporation, an Indiana Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- 20th Century Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.