Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Sentinel Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. 69334PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Appellant filed an action for declaratory relief and damages for insurance bad faith. After an adverse compulsory arbitration hearing, appellant requested a trial de novo. He challenges both an order denying postarbitration discovery and an order granting the insurer’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm the first order and reverse the latter.

The order granting summary judgment raises a significant question about the scope of an insurer’s duty of good faith. In this connection we hold an insurer’s duty is not necessarily excused where an item of information is omitted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Trishan Air, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Mariscal v. Old Republic Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API