Legal Opinion
DOES I THROUGH III v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2011No. Civil Action 01-2398 (HHK)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HENRY H. KENNEDY, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs are three mentally disabled adult women who have received habilitation services from the District of Columbia. 1 They bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the District consented to the performance of non-emergency surgical procedures on plaintiffs without authority to do so. 2 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint [Dkt. #213]. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition thereto, and the record of this case, the Court concludes that leave to file a…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jiggetts v. CipulloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.