Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 9, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0449PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff Shilisa Rhodes brought this medical malpractice action against the United States, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671, et seq., for damages allegedly sustained from negligent medical treatment provided by Unity Health Care, Inc. (“Unity”) and Jamie Hill-Daniel, M.D., from December 2009 to March 2011. Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs claim that Dr. Hill-Daniel and Unity acted negligently by failing to refer her in a timely…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Estate of Hirshfeld v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Colvin v. Syrian Arab RepublicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Lenkiewicz v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Boesen v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Bova v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.