Legal Opinion

United States v. Honeywell International, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2008-0961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the United States’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [Dkt. 136]. 1 Upon consideration of the parties’ written submissions, the relevant ease law, and the oral arguments presented by counsel on July 14, 2016, the Court will grant the motion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Judge Richard W. Roberts of this Court previously recounted the factual and procedural history of this case in several written opinions. See United States v. Honeywell Int’l Inc., 798 F.Supp.2d 12…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Harris v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Barkley v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Cause of Action Inst. v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Calixto v. United States Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  4. Cause of Action Institute v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  5. United States v. Care Services Management LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API