Legal Opinion

Miller v. National American Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1976No. Civ. 35575PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, P. J.

Plaintiff, respondent and cross-appellant William C. Miller (hereinafter respondent) commenced this action against defendant, appellant and cross-respondent National American Life Insurance Company of California (hereinafter appellant) in the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The complaint set forth two causes of action: breach of a contract of disability insurance, and fraud in inducing respondent to enter the contract. The complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages.

Following a jury trial judgment was entered in favor of respondent for…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Flanigan v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 1959

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API