Legal Opinion

State v. Berry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1982No. 815SC1398PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant first assigns error to the denial of his motion to dismiss. He contends the case should have been dismissed because the evidence as to his fingerprint found at Mrs. Swart’s house was not sufficient to support a conviction. We agree that without the fingerprint there is not sufficient evidence to convict the defendant in this case. When the State relies on a fingerprint found at the scene of the crime, in order to withstand a motion to dismiss, there must be substantial evidence of circumstances from which the jury can find that the fingerprint could have been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. TewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. WortheySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. CappsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API