Legal Opinion

State v. Worthey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1967No. 670PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in overruling his motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. Considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and giving to the State every reasonable inference and intendment to be drawn therefrom, as we must do on motion for nonsuit, we hold there was plenary evidence to repel defendant’s motion for nonsuit. State v. Roux, 266 N.C. 665, 146 S.E. 2d 654.

Defendant further contends that the court committed error in failing to charge that the jury could bring in a verdict of guilty of the misdemeanor of non-felonious…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. RouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. HailstockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API