Legal Opinion

State v. Bass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1981No. 35PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The controlling question on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. We hold the evidence insufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for nonsuit.

A motion to nonsuit requires the trial court to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, take it as true, and give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. Regardless of whether the evidence is direct, circumstantial, or both, if there is evidence from which a jury could find the offense charged has been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. StallingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. BarnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API