Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1979No. 37PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

The decisive question on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Such a motion requires the Court to consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and to give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from it. In this case the State relied solely upon circumstantial evidence. However, if there is substantial evidence to support a finding that the offense charged has been committed and that defendant committed it, the motion to nonsuit should be denied whether the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. SokolowskiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. State v. DeCastroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API