Legal Opinion

State v. Tew

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1951No. 219PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Appellant lists sixty-four assignments of error in the record on this appeal, of which thirty are based upon exceptions to the admission of evidence, and twenty-five or more upon exceptions to the charge of the court, — covey shots, so to speak. Upon these, ten questions are stated in brief of appellant, as being involved. We find, however, upon careful consideration, that only a few of them require express treatment.

1. Defendant in bis brief contends that tbe court erred in admitting into evidence “pictures of tbe glass, fingerprints and other objects in explanation of tbe testimony of tbe…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. Van LandinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API