Legal Opinion

Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Schwan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 5, 2004No. A04-368PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

On January 12, 2004, respondents filed a motion seeking to enjoin appellants from competing with respondents in accord with a non-solicitation clause contained in employment contracts between appellant Schwan and respondents. The district court issued a temporary injunction, enjoining appellants from violating the non-solicitation clause, effective until July 1, 2004. This appeal follows.

FACTS

Respondents Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. and Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co. hired appellant Eleanor Schwan on October 1, 1988, as an insurance agent, to sell insurance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Matter of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Verhein v. PiperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API