Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Boyd

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 7, 2004No. A03-676Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On July 16, 2003, the court suspended respondent James J. Boyd from the practice of law for a period of six months with all but 30 days of the suspension stayed. The July 16, 2003, order required respondent to successfully complete the professional responsibility portion of the bar examination within one year from the date of the order.

By order dated August 2, 2004, the court, at respondent’s request, extended the time for respondent to pass the professional responsibility examination. The order also stated that “[n]o further extensions of time will be granted. The court will issue an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchwanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API