State v. Rud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendants, who were charged with criminal sexual abuse of children, subpoenaed the alleged victims and another child to appear at the probable cause portion of the omnibus hearing. Defendants claimed that they needed to question the children in an attempt to determine as specifically as possible the dates of the alleged misconduct. Defendants argued that they then might be able to testify or call other witnesses at the hearing to support a motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause. The trial court quashed the subpoenas but certified the question to the Court of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WaukazoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. EllertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.