Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Employment Department

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2010No. Agency 07-AB-1130; CA A136061; SC S056569PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

In this unemployment compensation case, the Employment Appeals Board (the board) concluded that claimant was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he voluntarily left work without good cause. Claimant, on judicial review of the board’s order, challenged that determination; the Court of Appeals affirmed. McDowell v. Employment Dept., 222 Or App 170, 193 P3d 989 (2008). As explained below, because we conclude that claimant voluntarily left work with good cause, we reverse the Court of Appeals decision and remand to the board.

The facts, as pertinent to the issues before us, are not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Babcock v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Department of Workforce ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Avanti Press, Inc. v. Employment Department Tax SectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Warkentin v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Campbell v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Compressed Pattern, LLC v. Employment Department Tax SectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API