Neal v. City of Kingman
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Justice.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Zoning Administrator of the City of Kingman found that a highway sign adver tising a McDonald’s restaurant did not comply with the applicable Kingman sign ordinance. The sign owner, Richard Neal, appealed to the Kingman Board of Adjustment, which affirmed the Administrator’s finding. On review by special action, the superior court affirmed the Board, but independently held that the sign owner had a vested right to maintain the sign as erected, even though it did not comply with the sign ordinance. On appeal by the City, a majority of the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Calixto v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Rouse v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Sevilla v. SweatCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Southwest Soil Remediation, Inc. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Pingitore v. Town of Cave CreekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Watahomigie v. Arizona Board of Water Quality AppealsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.