Legal Opinion
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 31, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6121PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
This appeal involves a decision entered by the Arizona Racing Commission suspending the owner-trainer racing license of appellee Mitch DeGroot for a period of two years and imposing a fine against him in the amount of $2,000. The suspension was based upon the Commission’s finding that the presence of a drug, “Nalbuphine” had been detected in a urine sample taken from DeGroot’s horse, Bingo Arrive, after a race at Prescott Downs. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-901, et seq., DeGroot appealed the Commission’s decision to the Maricopa County Superior Court. After reviewing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Webb v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Bd. of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Comeau v. Arizona State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Eastern Vanguard Forex Ltd. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.