Legal Opinion
Pingitore v. Town of Cave Creek
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 7, 1998No. 1 CA-CV 97-0311PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 The Town of Cave Creek, its Town Council and its Board of Adjustment appeal from the superior court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of George and Kris Pingitore. The Pingitores sought relief from the court after the Board affirmed two orders issued by the Town halting construction of the Pingitores’ residence. In granting the Pingitores summary judgment, the court concluded that (1) the Town’s zoning ordinance is unconstitutionally vague, (2) the Pingitores have a vested right to complete construction of their residence at the planned site and (3) the Town is estopped…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuster v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Freightways, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Winkle v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Lowe v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Gorman v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Austin Shea (Arizona) 7th Street & Van Buren, L.L.C. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Luther Construction Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.