Whiteco Outdoor Advertising v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The primary issue in this case is whether a charter city, in the exercise of its general regulatory police powers, may ban light fixtures mounted on the bottom of existing billboards, or whether Arizona’s nonconforming use statute, A.R.S. § 9-462.02(A), precludes it from doing so. Adopting the latter view, the trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Whiteco Outdoor Advertising. The City of Tucson appeals from that ruling and the trial court’s judgment entered thereon. We vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Whiteco…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Stevens v. Mehagian's Home Furnishings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Strode v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Files v. BernalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Stagecoach Trails Mhc, L.L.C. v. City of BensonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Jones v. County of CoconinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.