Legal Opinion

Trenholm v. Kloepper

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1911No. 16,503PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Willard E. Stewart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

The plaintiff alleges in her petition that in January, 1905, she bought from the defendant ten shares of the capital stock of a corporation; that to induce her to make said purchase the defendant orally agreed to pay to her *237upon demand tlie amount of money she should pay for said stock; that she has requested the defendant to pay said money, hut he refuses, etc. The defendant denies the alleged agreement, and pleads the statute of frauds and an alleged estoppel. Plaintiff prevailed, and the defendant appeals.

1. The argument of counsel goes largely to the application of the statute of frauds…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barr v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gettinger v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Kilbride v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Murphy v. GouldNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Bankers Realty Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Reichert v. MulderNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Kunzmann v. PetteysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Lingelbach v. LuckenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API