Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Gould

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1894No. 5122PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the district court of Sheridan county. Tried below before Kinkaid, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

This action was brought in the court below by Mary J. Gould, for herself and her minor children, against the principals and sureties upon two liquor dealers’ bonds to recover damages for loss of means of support occasioned by the sale of intoxicating liquors by P. B. Murphy & Son and Henry Harrison, the principals in said bonds, to Willard Gould, the husband of said plaintiff. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against the defendants for the sum of $500, to reverse which the saloon-keepers, and their bondsmen prosecute error to this court.

The first' three assignments of error relate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. FisherdickNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Roose v. PerkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Hiatt v. KinkaidNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lowe v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. McClay v. WorrallNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Chadron v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Mullen v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gravely v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Blodgett v. McMurtryNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API