Kilbride v. Moss
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover fifteen hundred dollars under the following circumstances:
The “California Lustral Company” was a corporation, duly organized under the laws of the state of California. Defendant Franklin Moss was a large stockholder therein, a director and vice-president of the company, and, with another, held a mortgage upon the property of the company.
The corporation was indebted to sundry creditors, some of whom were pressing payment.
Plaintiff had fifteen hundred dollars, and defendant Moss proposed to him to purchase therewith six thousand shares of the capital stock…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Green v. BrookinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Henry Hill, in Error v. Caleb B. Smith and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Dykes v. Clem Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Barrett-Hicks Co. v. GlasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Meyer v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.